RSS

Lawyers squabble over control of legal services monopoly & regulation as Scots consumers forced to wait for wider access to justice

09 Mar

Law Society of ScotlandLaw Society’s argument to maintain closed shop legal services weak. The debate on the Legal Services Bill, which aims to open up Scotland’s monopolistic legal services market, currently dominated by solicitors & the Law Society of Scotland, took another twist at the weekend with the appearance on television of the current President of the Law Society, Ian Smart & the Govan Law Centre’s Mike Dailly, where chiefly, the concerns of the profession itself were debated, rather than how consumers would ultimately benefit from long needed changes to the way we choose our legal representatives & access justice.

A clip of the interview, from BBC Scotland’s The Politics Show, passed onto me makes for interesting viewing for all those concerned about how the legal profession wish to keep their business market stitched up as the long held monopoly which lawyers have been used to maintaining over the public’s access to justice.

Both Mr Smart & Mr Dailly appeared not so interested in the lot of the client, (who is after all paying for them to offer legal services as a business, rather than some noble cause which serves the community) more the representatives of the legal profession, minus anyone from the consumer lobby, appeared to focus on the internal squabble for control of the Law Society itself, and its current dual roles of representing solicitors as well as regulating them, and of course its alleged claims to represent the clients best interests, claims which we all know to be .. well … a deceit.

Law Society President Ian Smart & Govan Law Centre’s Mike Dailly on Legal Services Reform.

From the debate I note Mr Dailly brings up the well known issue of supermarkets & banks price fixing their services & products. Well of course we all know the legal profession does exactly the same, and gets away with it time & again as there is no recourse to question solicitors bills (false, padded, or genuine) other than submitting the account to an almost bogus audit to the auditor of the court, who also usually happens to be a solicitor.

I think we need less of those one sheet A4 letters with four lines of text on it, charged at £160+VAT each which solicitors are so famous for charging clients for (usually around 10 or more at a time over at least a year and nothing achieved in the client’s case) and more competition where consumers will be able to shop around for legal services rather than be ripped off by the current crop of … well .. for the want of a better term, qualified robbers ?

Fortunately for Scots, there are more sensible forces in the debate on legal services reform such as Which?, who have done a lot of work to bring the Legal Services Bill to the Scottish Parliament, after the whole process was kicked off by the Which? “super-complaint” to the Office of Fair Trading, which you can read about in a previous report, here :Consumers call for OFT Inquiry to investigate restriction of legal services in Scotland

Which? recently did a survey of consumers, supporting the notion that most Scots wish to see a more open legal services market, and be given freedom of choice on who represents their legal interests, rather than being forced to use a solicitor who can basically charge what they want (that old price fixing model solicitors have been used to all these years).

Which? research concluded most Scots want more open legal services market & independent regulation (click on images to view larger versions)

Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 1 Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 2 Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 3 Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 4

Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 5 Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 6 Which consumer resarch on legal services for Scotland Page 7

For consumers to be able to trust & depend on legal services, independent regulation is a must, considering the disgraceful history of the Law Society of Scotland and now the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission on the subject of regulating complaints against solicitors.

Sadly the Scottish Governments Legal Services Bill currently lacks any significant proposals for independent regulation of legal services in Scotland, as the Law Society seems to have easily arm twisted the likes of Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill into backing away from that idea for now … but the campaign goes on to bring fully independent regulation to Scotland’s currently ill served legal services market.

Advertisements
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One response to “Lawyers squabble over control of legal services monopoly & regulation as Scots consumers forced to wait for wider access to justice

  1. yoshizen

    March 9, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    As I had the Experience to proceed up to the Appeal Court, and stand against the President and Lord Justices (one of them was Lord Nolan), making 1.5 hours speech as a Litigant in Person,
    I got a lot to say, (but not much today).
    ——-
    Trouble in Judiciary here is not just accessibility, but the system of the closed self-preservation.
    Or system of the concealment, behind of the so-called
    Independence of the Judiciary.
    ——-
    For instance, there is no recording in
    the Appeal Court. So that any argument
    even with Prima facie evidence will be
    disappeared, unless, The Lord Justice
    (in my case It was the President) didn’t
    mentioned in his Judgment.
    With the Authority of the President
    anything can be suppressed and white
    washed. —– No accountability at all.
    ——–
    So that, when Lord Nolan was appointed to be the chairman of so-called
    Sleazy Committee, I faxed a dossier to
    Private Eye Mag’—- same night I was assaulted and hospitalized in coma.
    (Chanel 4 knew my case, BBC knew as
    well, Liberty, Amnesty Int’ knew, though, nobody want to touch the Case
    with so-called “D-factor”)
    This is the Justice in this country.
    Yoshizen

     

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: